Title: Two comments
.Leon - May 11, 2008 12:17 PM (GMT)
First of all, Co-Admin sounds noobish to me. I'm new at BB and I already know BB isn't a noob, so that's why I'm telling you. I advise you change it to 'Assistant Admin' or something, but not Co. It sounds so retarded. :R
My next comment is how you don't have sub-forums for solved feedback/completed things. If you aren't going to, at least set-up a multi moderation for solved feedback that adds a [S] to the front of it and a [C] for the completed feedback; it looks more organized that way.
Other than that... :D You pwn. :O
HelenaZF - May 11, 2008 08:33 PM (GMT)
Co- and Assistant mean two different things. I admin this board with Cory. I am not his assistant, so assistant would not be appropriate in this case.
We could both be listed as admins, I suppose, but this way it is immediately clear that Cory is the alpha admin here. :)
And to address your other comment, why does feedback need to be solved? That assumes all feedback requires an action to be taken. Feedback is most useful when it is open-ended and other ideas can be added. Having a subforum for very old feed back topics might be an option if the forum starts to fill up, but at this point there is not enough traffic here to warrant it.
.Leon - May 11, 2008 11:29 PM (GMT)
Whilst you may not be his 'assistant', co sounds noobish. Perhaps, he is the Senior Admin and you the Admin, or you are the Forum Admin or whatnot. Co is noobish. :P
As for the your second counter, it is simply more neat.
Xarina - May 11, 2008 11:40 PM (GMT)
Personally I have no problem with how it is now, and I rarely never look at the team-icons. I don't think Co-Admin sounds noobish, honestly Admin assistant sounds more noobish in my opinion. :/
Chris - May 12, 2008 06:58 AM (GMT)
The amount of stes that use co-owner co-admin it's unreal. There isn't a problem with it.
HelenaZF - May 12, 2008 07:04 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (.Leon) |
| Perhaps, he is the Senior Admin and you the Admin, or you are the Forum Admin or whatnot. |
I kind of fancy the title of "Whatnot". We'll discuss it.
Justin - May 12, 2008 07:16 AM (GMT)
The title name doesn't matter, as long as that person is doing their job correctly, which Helena is doing, is no problem.
Itachi69 - May 12, 2008 10:47 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (.Leon @ May 11 2008, 06:17 AM) |
First of all, Co-Admin sounds noobish to me. I'm new at BB and I already know BB isn't a noob, so that's why I'm telling you. I advise you change it to 'Assistant Admin' or something, but not Co. It sounds so retarded. :R
My next comment is how you don't have sub-forums for solved feedback/completed things. If you aren't going to, at least set-up a multi moderation for solved feedback that adds a [S] to the front of it and a [C] for the completed feedback; it looks more organized that way.
Other than that... :D You pwn. :O |
I don't think C.O. Admin sounds noobish,many boards use that title including my own.If you would like to explain to me though how it sounds nobish and why I would gladly like to hear. :)
I see no problem in that title and think it's fine how it is. ;)